RWDS
Dataset

RWDS

RWDS - Benchmarking Object Detectors under Real-World Distribution Shifts in Satellite Imagery (CVPR 2025)

Abstract

Object detectors have achieved remarkable performance in many applications; however, these deep learning models are typically designed under the iid assumption, meaning they are trained and evaluated on data sampled from the same (source) distribution. In real-world deployment, however, target distributions often differ from source data, leading to substantial performance degradation. Domain Generalisation (DG) seeks to bridge this gap by enabling models to generalise to Out-Of-Distribution (OOD) data without access to target distributions during training, enhancing robustness to unseen conditions. In this work, we examine the generalisability and robustness of state-of-the-art object detectors under real-world distribution shifts, focusing particularly on spatial domain shifts. Despite the need, a standardised benchmark dataset specifically designed for assessing object detection under realistic DG scenarios is currently lacking. To address this, we introduce Real-World Distribution Shifts (RWDS), a suite of three novel DG benchmarking datasets that focus on humanitarian and climate change applications. These datasets enable the investigation of domain shifts across (i) climate zones and (ii) various disasters and geographic regions. To our knowledge, these are the first DG benchmarking datasets tailored for object detection in real-world, high-impact contexts. We aim for these datasets to serve as valuable resources for evaluating the robustness and generalisation of future object detection models. Our datasets and code are available at https://github. com/RWGAI/RWDS.

Team

Related publications

Humanitarian AI2025

Benchmarking Object Detectors under Real-World Distribution Shifts in Satellite Imagery

Sara Al-Emadi, Yin Yang, Ferda Ofli. Computer Vision, Pattern Recognition — (CVPR) (2025)
DOI
AI-Human Interaction2026

It's Not How They Talk, It's Who They Are: Learning Style, Not Interaction Modality, Predicts AI Newbies’ Engagement with Educational Chatbots

Trang Xuan, Joni Salminen, Jack Tillotson, Waleed Akhtar, Thanh Van Bui, Kholoud Khalil Aldous, Johanne Medina, Soon-gyo Jung, Bernard J. Jansen — Journal of Educational Technology Systems (2026)
DOI
AI-Human Interaction2026

What it means to learn with GenAI: Theorising student teachers’ perspectives on learning with GenAI through Q methodology research

Youmen Chaaban, Soon-Gyo Jung, Bernard J Jansen — European Journal of Teacher Education (2026)
DOI
Humanitarian AI2026

DisasterVQA: A Visual Question Answering Benchmark Dataset for Disaster Scenes

Aisha Al-Mohannadi, Ayisha Firoz, Yin Yang, Muhammad Imran, Ferda Ofli — Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (2026)
DOI
AI-Human Interaction2026

Agentic Engagement with Educational AI Chatbots Among Pre-service Teachers: A Mixed-Method Study in Qatar

Youmen Chaaban, Soon-Gyo Jung, Bernard J Jansen — Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice (2026)
DOI
1–5 of 37 publications

Connections

ResearchPeoplePublications
RWDSHumanitarian AIDr. Ferda OfliDr. Sara A. Al-EmadiBenchmarking Object D…It's Not How They Tal…What it means to lear…DisasterVQA: A Visual…Agentic Engagement wi…From Priming Modaliti…Understanding User En…AI representing perso…Examining Student Tea…Cipherbot: An AI-Powe…Investigating the Usa…What is User Engageme…